Robert Pattinson: Vanity Fair December Issue Scans

SOURCE

Per the source please do not archive in website galleries.

19 comments:

Karina said...: I was wrong, I admit it. I freaked out with the whole Leo comparision, thinking it was going to contrast him in a lame way. But the whole leo comparison was that Robert didn't want to be leo. Whew. lol

This is not an interview really for a Robert fan, it covers things most fans already know. But it is a nice primer for VF readers who would never watch Twilight to see he's more interesting than just a pretty face.; November 4, 2009 at 12:16 AM
roxiegirl said...: I refuse to read this until I get my magazine :)(that's what she said...) but jeez the number of pictures (glorious and gorgeous!) in this article are amazing. I've seen a lot of celebrity spreads in VF since I have a subscription, but I have NEVER seen one with this many pictures. Wowza. He has ARRIVED. (Of course we all knew that a long time ago....); November 4, 2009 at 12:26 AM
Rhonda said...: I enjoyed the article and have no idea what all the controversy is about. Sounds exactly like the Rob we have all come to know and love. The photos are amazing. He looks incredibly handsome & sexy.; November 4, 2009 at 12:37 AM
cutecandy said...: Article is also up on Vanity Fair website; November 4, 2009 at 12:50 AM
GOROB said...: Does anybody know if Rob is just getting $10 million for all these movies! THAT MAKES ME SO MAD! WHAT KIND OF A AGENT DOES HE HAVE! WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please somebody correct me if I am wrong! I see she often mentioned how much he was making why no comment on that!; November 4, 2009 at 1:37 AM
GOROB said...: On second thought may he is getting some kind of a percentage deal also! I can't believe a money maker like Rob is being treated like this and other so called big stars are raking in $20 million dollar deals with their pictures crapping out at the theatres! Please somebody in the know let me in on the inner workings of his contract! Please forgive my rantings but I think it is so unfair because all of this has really taken a toll on Rob's life and I hate to see him cheated while Summit rakes in the dough!; November 4, 2009 at 1:50 AM
Lucerne said...: I just read the Vanity Fair article which was posted (going to pick up the magazine this week) and I must say, except for Catherine’s “drunk” comment the article was pretty good. I was fearful after the excerpt was released and all hell broke loose in cyber world. Happy to see that it was just overreaction.

GOROB, I hope that the $10 million that was quoted is incorrect. While $10mill is a lot of money, it sounds a little low considering how much money twilight has made Summit/ and is slatted to make. I would hope his agent/manager were able to re-negotiate after Twilight was such a hit. In addition to the twilight saga pay check, one wonders if he has a piece of the merchandises that have his face plastered all over it. I hope he does have a piece of the action.; November 4, 2009 at 1:51 AM
qiupang said...: nobody has an objection about the Hugh Grant analogy?; November 4, 2009 at 1:52 AM
GOROB said...: I just read that Nicole Kidman is gonna star opposite Rob in Belami! WOW!; November 4, 2009 at 1:56 AM
GOROB said...: I just read that Nicole Kidman is gonna star opposite Rob in Belami! WOW!; November 4, 2009 at 1:56 AM
Karina said...: I didn't really get the Hugh Grant comparison either. lol I would have thought they would have name dropped someone who likes to play "weirdos," since that was the running idea throughout.

I still think the GQ article was the best profile on him by far. That was just a rich article.; November 4, 2009 at 2:04 AM
GOROB said...: I don't think that Leo is a much better actor than Hugh! I hate it when people compare actors! Why can't Rob be his own icon in the business and not be compared to Orlando or Leo or Hugh which is their way of trying to box Rob in! Personally I think Rob can go farther than people give him credit for! By the way I got the info about Bel Ami from Production Weekly Twitter! It will 2 directors and also star Nicole Kidman and it starts shooting in Feb! GODZE(wink); November 4, 2009 at 2:11 AM
RPLover said...: I didn't really find anything here to be all that shocking or worth getting upset over! I still think that CH's comments were kinda dumb, considering the situation, but other than that...{shrugs}; November 4, 2009 at 2:27 AM
Anonymous said...: I liked the article, don't see why he'd be compaired to Hugh Grant, that guy can't do anything but light comedy and isn't nearly as good looking. I don't find him like Leo either, Leo has become a much better actor over the years (The Aviator, Blood Diamond, The Departed as examples)He still has a baby face and I never found him personally attractive myself..he is cute..but not my type, and certainly doesn't have Rob's depth as a person, always too full of himself.

Nicole Kidman..oh dear, I hope she's not going to be the kiss of death again...; November 4, 2009 at 2:39 AM
Babs said...: I think that this article is like Robert Pattinson 101, and as Twilight came out a year ago, I think it's a bit too late for that. But it's nice to read how he felt about it all from his own words.
I was expecting something like a Q&A kind of thing, instead of a bunch of quotes from CH and CW.
Anyway I don't think this article makes him look bad at all.
I don't get the comparison to Hugh Grant, or even Leo, for that matters. Rob is not someone you can easily label or categorize.; November 4, 2009 at 4:14 AM
peeling a fig said...: I thought it was a bit patronising to the fandom, though Comic Con might leave any sane journalist reeling. Pegged as teens again, damnit. I'm no teen.

Otherwise, some good insights here and there, some new quotes.

What a total contrast to the Harper's photos, eh? VF is all brood and slouch, but in a sort of fake weekend-in-the-Hamptons vignette, compared to the surreal, gothic,ambiguous-era Harper's shoot, where they obviously had some genuine smiles. I would have like a few more smiling VF photos.; November 4, 2009 at 4:43 AM
Suz said...: Great article!; November 4, 2009 at 7:44 AM
sas said...: Interesting article, though I think a comparison with Johnny Depp would be more appropriate, like other times. Just because Hugh Grant is British, does not mean they are the same.

Definitely going to pick this up asap.; November 4, 2009 at 2:24 PM
whocares said...: loved the article. the way he talks about himself and stuff... he cracks me up. love him.; November 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM